Rehabilitation Characteristics and Outcomes for Lung Transplantation for COVID-19: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can result in irreversible lung damage, with some individuals requiring lung transplantation. The purpose of this case series is to describe the initial experience with the rehabilitation and functional outcomes of 9 patients receiving a lung transplant for COVID-19. METHODS: Nine individuals, ranging in age from 37 to 68 years, received bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation (BOLT) for COVID-19 between December 2020 and July 2021. Rehabilitation was provided before and after the transplant, including in-hospital rehabilitation, postacute care inpatient rehabilitation, and outpatient rehabilitation. RESULTS: Progress with mobility was limited in the pretransplant phase despite rehabilitation efforts. Following transplantation, 2 individuals expired before resuming rehabilitation, and 2 others had complications that delayed their progress. The remaining 5 experienced clinically important improvements in mobility and walking capacities. CONCLUSION: Considerable rehabilitation resources are required to care for individuals both before and after BOLT for COVID-19. Rehabilitation can have a profound impact on both functional and clinical outcomes for this unique patient population. IMPACT: There is limited literature on the rehabilitation efforts and outcomes for patients who received BOLT for COVID-19. Occupational therapists and physical therapists play an important role during the pretransplant and posttransplant recovery process for this novel patient population. LAY SUMMARY: Patients with a bilateral orthotopic lung transplant due to COVID-19 require a unique rehabilitation process. They have significant difficulties with activities of daily living and functional mobility across the pretransplant and posttransplant continuum of care, but progressive gains in functional performance may be possible with a comprehensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program.

Post-operative, inpatient rehabilitation after lung transplant evaluation (PIRATE): A feasibility randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative rehabilitation is crucial following lung transplantation (LTx); however, it is unclear whether intensive rehabilitation is feasible to deliver in the acute setting. We aimed to establish the feasibility and safety of intensive acute physiotherapy post-LTx. METHODS: This feasibility trial randomized 40 adults following bilateral sequential LTx to either standard (once-daily) or intensive (twice-daily) physiotherapy. Primary outcomes were feasibility (recruitment and delivery of intensive intervention) and safety. Secondary outcomes included six-minute walk test; 60-second sit-to-stand; grip strength; physical activity; pain; EQ-5D-5L; length of stay; and readmissions. Data were collected at baseline, week 3, and week 10 post-LTx. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03095859. RESULTS: Of 83 LTx completed during the trial, 49% were eligible and 48% provided consent. Median age was 61 years {range 18-70}; waitlist time 85 days [IQR 35-187]. Median time to first mobilization was 2 days [2-3]. Both groups received a median of 10 [7-14] standard interventions post-randomization. A median of 9 [6-18] individual intensive interventions were attempted (86% successful), the most common barrier being medical procedures/investigations (67%). No intervention-related adverse events or between-group differences in secondary outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Acute, intensive physiotherapy was feasible and safe post-LTx. This trial provides data to underpin definitive trials to establish efficacy.

Early Change in Lower Limb Strength and Function in Lung Transplant Patients After Center-Based and Telerehabilitation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the change and relationship among quadriceps torque (QT) and physical function in adult lung transplant (LTx) patients undergoing rehabilitation. METHODS: A prospective study assessed 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, QT, and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at the start of pre-habilitation and 10-12 wk post-LTx. Functional outcomes were examined for within-group differences for participants who completed center-based rehabilitation between September 2019 and March 2020 and participants who completed telerehabilitation ("telerehab") between March 2020 and June 2021 during COVID-19. Relationships between QT, SPPB, and 6MWT were examined pre- and post-LTx. RESULTS: A total of 49 LTx recipients were included (30 men, 61 [56-67] yr, 26 center-based rehab, and 23 telerehab). The 6MWT increased (median 75 m: 95% CI, 35 - 117, P < .0001), and the telerehab group showed an LTx decrease in QT (-9.6 Nm: 95% CI, -29 to -2.3, P = .02) and an increased gait speed (0.21 m/sec: 95% CI, 0.11 - 0.47, P < .0001). Pre-LTx QT showed a moderate correlation to pre-LTx SPPB ( r = 0.41, P = .004) and weak correlations to gait speed and 6MWT ( r ranging from 0.21 to 0.35, P < .05). Post-LTx QT showed moderate correlations to post-LTx SPPB ( r = 0.43, P = .002), gait speed ( r = 0.54, P < .001), five-time sit-to-stand ( r =-0.57, P < .0001), and 6MWT ( r = 0.62, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early post-LTx 6MWT and gait speed increased with no improvement in QT or other SPPB components. Correlations between QT and measures of exercise capacity and lower limb function were stronger post-LTx. Serial measurements may further inform functional trajectories and rehabilitation models.

Interdisciplinary Management for the First Patient With Post-COVID Double-Lung Transplantation in Inpatient Rehabilitation in the United States: A Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, lung transplantation is being used as a life-saving treatment. This case report describes the rehabilitation course of the first documented individual in the United States post bilateral lung transplant for COVID-19. METHODS (CASE DESCRIPTION): The patient is a 28-year-old woman who was previously healthy and who failed all other life-saving medical interventions before undergoing bilateral lung transplantation, resulting in an extended hospital stay and significant physical debility. RESULTS: Through an interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach, the patient was able to achieve functional improvements in strength, balance, endurance, and functional mobility to safely discharge home. CONCLUSION: Research is needed regarding optimal treatment of this patient population because lung transplantation continues to be used for long-term medical management of COVID-19 infection. IMPACT: This is a case report describing rehabilitation for the first documented individual in the United States post bilateral lung transplant for COVID-19.

Impact of inspiratory muscle strength on exercise capacity after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Though inspiratory muscle strength is essential for patients with respiratory disease, it is unclear whether the recovery of inspiratory muscle strength contributes to an exemplary achievement of exercise tolerance after lung transplantation (LTx). We aimed to elucidate the inspiratory muscle strength affects the recovery of exercise capacity after LTx. METHODS: Recipients who underwent LTx between June 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled, and 6-min walking distance (6MWD), quadriceps force, inspiratory muscle strength (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP]), and spirometry were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after LTx. The relationships between inspiratory muscle strength and changes in physical performance were analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen recipients (mean age: 44.8 years, male: 32%) who completed all follow-ups were analyzed. At 3 months after LTx, mean MIP (88.4% predicted) and vital capacity (60.9% predicted), quadriceps force (QF; 2.1 N*m/kg), and 6MWD (504 m) were lower than normal values. After LTx, 6MWD significantly improved up to 12 months. From 3 to 6 months after LTx, changes in MIP were significantly associated with increases in 6MWD by univariate (r = 0.55, p = 0.02) and multivariate (ß = 0.59, p = 0.01) regression analyses, whereas changes of QF in place of MIP were significantly associated with the recoveries of 6MWD from 6 to 12 months. DISCUSSION: Improvements in MIP may impact the recovery of exercise capacity in the early phase after LTx. Factors that determine the improvement in exercise capacity following LTx may vary with postoperative time.

Consequences of ICU Readmission After Lung Transplantation: Beyond the Early Postoperative Period / Consecuencias del reingreso en la UCI tras el trasplante de pulmón: más allá del periodo postoperatorio temprano

No disponible

Exercise training for adult lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary transplantation is the final treatment option for people with end-stage respiratory diseases. Evidence suggests that exercise training may contribute to speeding up physical recovery in adults undergoing lung transplantation, helping to minimize or resolve impairments due to physical inactivity in both the pre- and post-transplant stages. However, there is a lack of detailed guidelines on how exercise training should be carried out in this specific sub-population. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and safety of exercise training in adult patients who have undergone lung transplantation, measuring the maximal and functional exercise capacity; health-related quality of life; adverse events; patient readmission; pulmonary function; muscular strength; pathological bone fractures; return to normal activities and death. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register up to 6 October 2020 using relevant search terms for this review. Studies in the CKTR are identified through CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE searches, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included comparing exercise training with usual care or no exercise training, or with another exercise training program in terms of dosage, modality, program length, or use of supporting exercise devices. The study population comprised of participants older than 18 years who underwent lung transplantation independent of their underlying respiratory pathology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed all records identified by the search strategy and selected studies that met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. In the first instance, the disagreements were resolved by consensus, and if this was not possible the decision was taken by a third reviewer. The same reviewers independently extracted outcome data from included studies and assessed risk of bias. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: Eight RCTs (438 participants) were included in this review. The median sample size was 60 participants with a range from 16 to 83 participants. The mean age of participants was 54.9 years and 51.9% of the participants were male. The median duration of the exercise training programs for the groups undergoing the intervention was 13 weeks, and the median duration of training in the active control groups was four weeks. Overall the risk of bias was considered to be high, mainly due to the inability to blind the study participants and the selective reporting of the results. Due to small number of studies included in this review, and the heterogeneity of the intervention and outcomes, we did not obtain a summary estimate of the results. Two studies comparing resistance exercise training with no exercise reported increases in muscle strength and bone mineral density (surrogate outcomes for pathological bone fractures) with exercise training (P > 0.05), but no differences in adverse events. Exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pulmonary function, and death (any cause) were not reported. Three studies compared two different resistant training programs. Two studies comparing squats using a vibration platform (WBVT) compared to squats on the floor reported an improvement in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) (28.4 metres, 95% CI 3 to 53.7; P = 0.029; and 28.3 metres, 95% CI 10.0 to 46.6; P < 0.05) with the WBVT. Supervised upper limb exercise (SULP) program improved 6MWT at 6 months compared to no supervised upper limb exercise (NULP) (SULP group: 561.2 ± 83.6 metres; NULP group: 503.5 ± 115.2 metres; P = 0.01). There were no differences in HRQoL, adverse events, muscular strength, or death (any cause). Pulmonary function and pathological bone fractures were not reported. Two studies comparing multimodal exercise training with no exercise reported improvement in 6MWT at 3 months (P = 0.008) and at 12-months post-transplant (P = 0.002) and muscular strength (quadriceps force (P = 0.001); maximum leg press (P = 0.047)) with multimodal exercise, but no improvement in HRQoL, adverse events, pulmonary function, pathological bone fractures (lumbar T-score), or death (any cause). One study comparing the same multimodal exercise programs given over 7 and 14 weeks reported no differences in 6MWT, HRQoL, adverse events, pulmonary function, muscle strength, or death (any cause). Pathological bone fractures were not reported. According to GRADE criteria, we rated the certainty of the evidence as very low, mainly due to the high risk of bias and serious imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In adults undergoing lung transplantation the evidence about the effects of exercise training is very uncertain in terms of maximal and functional exercise capacity, HRQoL and safety, due to very imprecise estimates of effects and high risk of bias.

Intensive pulmonary rehabilitation in a pediatric lung transplantation patient: A case report.

BACKGROUND: The pediatric lung transplant is a very important treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseae, and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is also an important factor in determining the prognosis. However, there is no much literature available on pulmonary rehabilitation in pediatric patients' post lung transplant. Through this case report, we would like to present our intensive PR program for pediatric patients' post-lung transplant. PATIENT CONCERNS: The 10-year-old boy's breathing before receiving a lung transplant continued to deteriorate and he eventually became dependent on a wheelchair. DIAGNOSIS: He was diagnosed with infantile acute lymphoblastic leukemia at 6 months of age. At the age of one year, he underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, but was diagnosed with post-transplantation bronchiolitis obliterans (PTBO) two months later. He had a lung transplant at the age of 10. INTERVENTIONS: He was hospitalized and received an initial assessment. This assessment included functional, cognitive, and psychological evaluations. He additionally completed PR exercises twice daily for two weeks. After discharge, he continued to participate in an outpatient-based PR program for three months. During the outpatient phase, PR exercises were performed once weekly, in addition to home-based cognitive training. OUTCOMES: Our intensive post-lung PR program improved our patient's exercise capacity, lung function, and quality of life. As a comprehensive rehabilitation service, our program also included a cognitive training component. CONCLUSION: We describe an intensive PR program tailored to pediatric patients' post-lung transplant. The program was feasible and resulted in improvements in functional exercise capacity, lung function, and quality of life. Future research into our method is necessary for continued improvement of this novel program.

Considerations for assessing physical function and physical activity in clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the conduct of clinical trials. For studies with physical function and physical activity outcomes that require in-person participation, thoughtful approaches in transitioning to the remote research environment are critical. Here, we share our experiences in transitioning from in-person to remote assessments of physical function and activity during the pandemic and highlight key considerations for success. Details on the development of the remote assessment protocol, integration of a two-way video platform, and implementation of remote assessments are addressed. In particular, procedural challenges and considerations in transitioning and conducting remote assessments will be discussed in terms of efforts to maintain participant safety, maximize study efficiency, and sustain trial integrity. Plans for triangulation and analysis are also discussed. Although the role of telehealth platforms and research activities in remote settings are still growing, our experiences suggest that adopting remote assessment strategies are useful and convenient in assessing study outcomes during, and possibly even beyond, the current pandemic. Trial register and number: ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03728257].

Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

Commenting on this book is a great privilege and an opportunity to share some emerging aspects regarding the development of pulmonary rehabilitation. Indeed, appreciating the therapeutic value of this modality is possible because of continuous research and tireless commitment of all professionals involved in the care of patients with respiratory diseases and pulmonary-related impairments....

The Utility of the Sit-to-Stand Test for Inpatients in the Acute Hospital Setting After Lung Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of physical function is important to guide physical therapy for patients post-lung transplantation (LTx). The Sit-to-Stand (STS) test has proven utility in chronic disease, but psychometric properties post-LTx are unknown. The study aimed to assess reliability, validity, responsiveness, and feasibility of the 60-second STS post-LTx. METHODS: This was a measurement study in 62 inpatients post-LTx (31 acute postoperative; 31 medical readmissions). Interrater reliability was assessed with 2 STS tests undertaken by different assessors at baseline. Known group validity was assessed by comparing STS repetitions in postoperative and medical groups. Content validity was assessed using comparisons to knee extensor and grip strength, measured with hand-held dynamometry. Criterion validity was assessed by comparison of STS repetitions and 6-minute walk distance postoperatively. Responsiveness was assessed using effect sizes over inpatient admission. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) age was 62 (56-67) years; time post-LTx was 5 (5-7) days postoperative and 696 (244-1849) days for medical readmissions. Interrater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient type 2,1 = 0.96), with a mean learning effect of 2 repetitions. Repetitions were greater for medical at baseline (mean 18 vs 8). More STS repetitions were associated with greater knee extensor strength (postoperative r = 0.57; medical r = 0.47) and 6-minute walk distance (postoperative r = 0.68). Effect sizes were 0.94 and 0.09, with a floor effect of 23% and 3% at baseline (postoperative/medical) improving to 10% at discharge. Patients incapable of attempting a STS test were excluded, reducing generalizability to critical care. Physical rehabilitation was not standardized, possibly reducing responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The 60-second STS demonstrated excellent interrater reliability and moderate validity and was responsive to change postoperatively. IMPACT: The 60-second STS represents a safe, feasible functional performance tool for inpatients post-LTx. Two tests should be completed at each time point.

The Need for Psychological Rehabilitation in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Transplant recipients have significant psychosocial stressors due to unique posttransplant sequela that results in an increased incidence of psychopathology. Posttransplant psychological interventions, especially in lung transplant recipients, are understudied, as the focus of prior research has emphasized pretransplant interventions. However, posttransplant psychological stability affects medical outcomes. The importance of posttransplant psychological intervention is highlighted. Recommendations exist which call for attention to specific psychological domains in the posttransplant recovery period and highlight the impact of psychological rehabilitation on overall wellness and success in recovery. A novel psychological rehabilitation intervention is outlined as a response to posttransplant intervention recommendations to demonstrate implementation.

The Efficacy of Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Bilateral Lung Transplantation.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is advocated in the pre- and post-lung transplantation (LTx) periods. However, there is limited literature on the benefit of PR post-LTx. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an outpatient, multidisciplinary, comprehensive PR program in bilateral LTx recipients in the early period after LTx. METHOD: Twenty-three LTx recipients were referred to the PR center. Change in incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests, hand and quadriceps strength, respiratory muscle strength (maximum inspiratory/expiratory pressure), dyspnea (Medical Research Council score), quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire), and psychological status (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale) were compared pre- and post-PR. RESULTS: Seventeen of 23 (74%) recipients completed PR, comprising 15 male and 2 female patients whose median age was 51 yr. The initiation of the program was 75 ± 15 d after LTx. The incremental shuttle walk test distance was predicted as 23% before PR and it increased to 36% after PR (P < .001); the endurance shuttle walk test distance also increased (P < .01). Significant improvement was seen in upper and lower extremity strength, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire scores and Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale scores reflected less anxiety and depressive symptoms. Furthermore, body mass and fat-free mass indices, maximum inspiratory pressure, and maximum expiratory pressure improved significantly. There was no significant change in forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration, forced vital capacity, or Medical Research Council scores. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients who attended PR within 3 mo of bilateral LTx showed improvements in exercise capacity, respiratory muscle strength, quality of life, body composition, and psychological status.

Employment after lung transplantation in Poland - a single center study.

OBJECTIVES: Lung transplantation not only saves a patient's life but also creates the opportunity for becoming more self-reliant and getting back to work. The aim of this single center study was to assess the prospects of employment, as well as its influence on the quality of life and physical activity, of the lung transplant recipients of the Silesian Center for Heart Diseases in Zabrze, Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study covered 67 lung transplant recipients of the Silesian Center of Heart Diseases. Only patients with ≥ 6-month follow-up were included. All of the patients gave their written consent to be included in the study before filling out the questionnaire containing questions about employment, income, education and how work affected their quality of life before and after lung transplantation. A physical capability assessment was performed by climbing flights of stairs and by means of a 6-min walk test, and spirometry parameters were also measured. RESULTS: Twenty of the patients included in the study (31.7%) were employed after lung transplantation, 63.2% of whom worked full-time. Profession was changed by 2 patients (14.3%). The patients diagnosed with cystic fibrosis were found to have the highest chance of finding employment after lung transplantation. The statistical analysis revealed that the employed patients were able to cover longer distances during the 6-min walk test (556 m, on average) than the unemployed ones (494 m, on average). CONCLUSIONS: One in 3 patients finds employment after lung transplantation. Work improves the quality of life of the majority of lung transplant recipients. The patients who are employed are also in a better physical condition, and they are more self-reliant in comparison to those who remain unemployed. Lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis are most likely to find employment, and so are patients with higher education. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019;32(3):379-86.

Evolution of Functional Exercise Capacity in Lung Transplant Patients With and Without Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome: A Longitudinal Case-Control Study / Evolución de la capacidad funcional al ejercicio en pacientes con trasplante pulmonar con y sin síndrome de bronqueolitis obliterante: estudio longitudinal de casos-control

Introduction: Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) is a debilitating disease with limited treatment options that threatens both the quality of life and long-term survival of lung transplant (LTx) recipients. This retrospective longitudinal case-control study was performed to compare the long-term functional evolution of LTx recipients with and without BOS. Methods: Twenty-four LTx recipients with BOS (BOS=Cases) and 24 without BOS (NON-BOS=Controls) were selected and individually matched according to age, gender, diagnosis and LTx characteristics. Measurements of 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), symptoms of dyspnea (BORG CR-10 scale), and comprehensive pulmonary function testing were performed before LTx and at annual follow-up assessments after LTx. Results: Peak FEV1 after LTx was similar in both groups [FEV1 (% predicted) 101 ± 25 vs. 101 ± 31, p = 0.96] and BOS diagnosis in cases was established 3.6 ± 2.5 years after LTx. At the final follow-up assessment (6.5 ± 3.2 years after LTx) FEV1 (% predicted) was 86 ± 34 in NON-BOS vs. 44 ± 17 in BOS (p < 0.001). Evolution of 6MWD was different between groups (group by time interaction: p = 0.002). Borg dyspnea scores were also significantly different between groups at the final evaluation (NON-BOS 3.3 ± 1.7 vs. BOS 5.0 ± 2.2; p = 0.024). Conclusions: We observed gradual reductions in functional exercise capacity and increasing symptoms of dyspnea in patients who developed BOS after LTx. As such, prospective studies seem warranted to explore whether rehabilitative interventions might be useful to improve symptoms and slow down deterioration of exercise capacity in these patients from the onset of BOS

Introducción: El síndrome de bronquiolitis obliterante (BOS) es una enfermedad debilitante con opciones de tratamiento limitadas que amenaza tanto la calidad de vida como la supervivencia a largo plazo de los trasplantados pulmonares (LTx). Este estudio longitudinal retrospectivo de casos-controles se realizó para comparar la evolución functional de los LTx con y sin BOS a largo plazo. Métodos: Se seleccionaron 24 LTx con BOS (BOS = casos) y 24 sin BOS (NON-BOS = controles). Los casos y controles se emparejaron individualmente atendiendo a la edad, el sexo, el diagnóstico y las características del trasplante. Las mediciones incluyeron: la distancia recorrida en la prueba de 6min marcha (6MWD), la disnea (BORG CR-10) y la función pulmonar, antes del LTx y anualmente en el post-LTx. Resultados: El FEV1 pico post-LTx fue similar en ambos grupos (FEV1 [% predicho] 101 ± 25 vs. 101 ± 31; p = 0,96) y el diagnóstico de BOS en los casos se estableció a los 3,6 ± 2,5 años del LTx. En la evaluación del seguimiento final (6,5 ± 3,2 años tras el LTx) el FEV1 (% predicho) fue del 86±34 en los NON-BOS vs. 44 ± 17 en los BOS (p < 0,001). La evolución del 6MWD fue diferente entre grupos (interacción tiempo por grupo: p = 0,002). La puntuación de disnea en la evaluación final también fue diferente significativamente entre grupos (NON-BOS 3,3 ± 1,7 vs. BOS 5,0 ± 2,2; p = 0,024). Conclusiones: Se ha observado una reducción gradual de la capacidad funcional de ejercicio y un incremento de la disnea en los pacientes con BOS tras el LTx. Así pues, parecen pertinentes estudios prospectivos para examinar si la rehabilitación puede mejorar la sintomatología y enlentecer el deterioro de la capacidad de ejercicio en los pacientes que desarrollan el BOS tras el trasplante

Multidisciplinary Inpatient Rehabilitation Following Heart and/or Lung Transplantation-Examining Cohort Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary transplantation is becoming a more common treatment option for advanced heart and/or lung disease. Specialist rehabilitation programs may assist recovery and enhance functional independence following transplantation. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the outcomes of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation following cardiopulmonary transplantation and describe cohort characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Subacute inpatient rehabilitation facility, located on-site at Australia's largest cardiopulmonary transplant center. PARTICIPANTS: Heart and/or lung transplant recipients (n = 116), admitted for multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation, between 2009 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received multidisciplinary rehabilitation as part of their standard care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Participants' functional independence was scored using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) upon rehabilitation admission and discharge. Physical measures of mobility and balance were assessed at the same time points, including the 6-minute walk test, 10 m walk, Timed Up and Go, and Berg Balance Scale. Process measures of interest included rehabilitation length of stay, interruptions to rehabilitation, and discharge destination. RESULTS: Average length-of-stay in rehabilitation was 26.9 ± 21.2 days (mean ± SD). FIM scores improved from 79.8 ± 20.3 on admission to 101.8 ± 29.1 at discharge (P < .001) for the pooled cohort. Physical measures of mobility and balance also improved: 6-minute walk test distances improved from 103.6 ± 80.1 to 183.2 ± 104.8 m (P < .001); Timed Up and Go results decreased from 26.4 ± 18.3 seconds to 16.5 ± 14.1 seconds (P < .001); and Berg Balance Scale scores increased from 26.8 ± 17.1 to 45.0 ± 9.4 (P < .001). Approximately one-third (33.6%) of admissions were interrupted by an acute medical complication; however, this did not preclude completion of rehabilitation or achievement of functional gains. Ninety-four percent of the cohort was discharged to a private residence following rehabilitation. No significant differences were observed between heart versus lung transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: For debilitated patients following heart and/or lung transplantation, physical function, mobility, and independence significantly improved following multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

An Ethical Framework for the Care of Patients with Prolonged Hospitalization Following Lung Transplantation.

The lung allocation score system in the United States and several European countries gives more weight to risk of death without transplantation than to survival following transplantation. As a result, centers transplant sicker patients, leading to increased length of initial hospitalization. The care of patients who have accumulated functional deficits or additional organ dysfunction during their prolonged stay can be ethically complex. Disagreement occurs between the transplant team, patients and families, and non-transplant health care professionals over the burdens of ongoing intensive intervention. These cases highlight important ethical issues in organ transplantation, including the nature and requirements of transplant informed consent, the limits of physician prognostication, patient autonomy and decision-making capacity following transplant, obligations to organ donors and to other potential recipients, and the impact of program metrics on individualized recipient care. We outline general ethical principles for the care of lung transplant recipients with prolonged hospitalization and give regulatory, research, and patient-centered recommendations for these cases.

Impairments in Postural Control and Retest Reliability of Dynamic Posturographic Measures After Lung Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to classify impairments in postural control using computerized posturography in lung transplant recipients undergoing subacute rehabilitation and to examine the retest reliability of these measures. METHODS: In a prospective repeated-measures study, 50 lung transplant recipients underwent clinical and quantitative posturographic testing (SMART EquiTest), which included the sensory organization test, motor control test, and limits of stability test. Testing was repeated after 1 to 2 days and upon completion of rehabilitation, 2 mos later. Main outcome measures were the following: sensory organization test-composite score, motor control test-latency and amplitude scaling, limits of stability test-movement velocity, and endpoint excursion/maximum excursion. RESULTS: At the beginning of rehabilitation, the mean sensory organization test-composite score and limits of stability test, but not the motor control test scores, were below normative reference values and and did not return to normal after rehabilitation. Intraclass correlation coefficients(2,1) yielded excellent relative reliability for all posturographic tests. The smallest detectable differences observed for the sensory organization test and limits of stability test exceeded the mean changes observed upon completion of rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Impairments in sensory and anticipatory postural control were insufficiently restored after subacute lung transplantation rehabilitation. The little sensitivity of the sensory organization test-composite score or limits of stability test scores to detect a minimal change in performance due to rehabilitation limits the clinical applicability of these tests as objective outcome measures in lung transplantation rehabilitation.

Nordic Walking in Pulmonary Rehabilitation of Patients Referred for Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Although the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease, cystic fibrosis, and interstitial lung disease is well documented, little is known about pulmonary rehabilitation in patients who are referred for lung transplantation. Nordic walking is a low-cost and accessible form of physical exercise with proven benefits. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine the effects of Nordic walking on lung function, perception of dyspnea, and health-related quality of life in patients referred for lung transplantation. METHODS: Twenty-two of 40 patients who was qualified for lung transplantation at the Department of Lung Diseases in Zabrze, Poland, completed a rehabilitation program consisting of 12 weeks of Nordic walking. Lung function tests, exercise tolerance, and perception of dyspnea and quality of life were assessed before and after completion of the program. RESULTS: No adverse events were observed during the rehabilitation program. After 12 weeks, there was a significant increase in mean 6-minute walk distance (374 meters vs 288 meters, P < .034) and a significant reduction in perception of dyspnea after completion of the rehabilitation program. Assessment of general health and quality of life showed significant improvement (P < .05). No significant changes in lung function tests were noted. CONCLUSION: Nordic walking is a safe and feasible physical activity for pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with end-stage lung disease who are referred for lung transplantation. This rehabilitation technique results in significant improvements in patient mobility and quality of life.